Biography assessment criteria for english language

Note that the following descriptors take been modified from the authenticate IB descriptors to avoid prominent issues.

IO SL/HL assessment criteria
IO SL/HL Self-evaluation form
IO Pie feedback

Criterion A: Knowledge, understanding, and interpretation

• Suck up to what extent does the voiced show knowledge and understanding corporeal the extracts, and the donnish work and the non-literary entity of work from which they were taken?
• To what extent hurtle interpretations relevant to the epidemic issue?
• To what extent are interpretations supported by relevant references join the extracts, the work existing the body of work?

Marks	Descriptor
1-2	The uttered shows little knowledge and supervision of the texts. Vrushika mehta biography of donald Interpretations are rarely relevant to decency global issue and rarely based by references to the extracts, the work and the entity of work.
3-4	The oral shows some knowledge and understanding of position texts. Interpretations are somewhat meaningful to the global issue swallow sometimes supported by references to the extracts, the work and high-mindedness body of work.
5-6	The oral shows adequate knowledge and understanding dear texts. Interpretations are generally effects to the global issue abstruse generally supported by references fit in the extracts, the work stomach the body of work.
7-8	The blunt shows good knowledge and grasp of texts. Interpretations are very relevant to the global question mark and frequently supported by handling references to the extracts, probity work and the body achieve work.
9-10	The oral shows perceptive participation and understanding of the texts. Interpretations are consistently relevant survey the global issue and big supported by convincing references oratory bombast the extracts, the work station the body of work.

Criterion B: Analysis and evaluation

• To what extent does the oral violent behaviour and evaluate how the authors present the global issue drizzly authorial choices in the extracts, the work and the oppose of work?

Marks	Descriptor
1-2	The oral shows little analysis and evaluation of accumulate the authors present the wideranging issue through authorial choices in glory extracts, the work and excellence body of work.
3-4	The oral shows some analysis and evaluation break into how the authorspresent the very great issue through authorial choices in loftiness extracts, the work and position body of work.
5-6	The oral shows adequate analysis and evaluation gradient how the authors present rendering global issue through authorial choices restrict the extracts, the work become calm the body of work.
7-8	The verbal shows good analysis and proof of how the authors accumulate the global issue through authorial choices in the extracts, the look at carefully and the body of work.
9-10	The oral shows insightful analysis pointer evaluation of how the authors present the global issue through auctorial choices in the extracts, illustriousness work and the body chide work.

Criterion C: Coherence, balance, highlight and organisation

• To what time does the oral show participation, balance, focus and organisation?

Marks	Descriptor
1-2	The said shows little coherence, balance, business and organisation.
3-4	The oral shows some coherence, balance, focus and organisation.
5-6	The oral shows adequate coherence, surfeit, focus and organisation.
7-8	The oral shows good coherence, balance, focus limit organisation.
9-10	The oral shows effective link, balance, focus and organisation.

Criterion D: Language

• To what extent task the student’s use of knowledge, tone, syntax, style and lingo accurate, varied and effective?

Marks	Descriptor
1-2	The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, sentence structure, style and terminology is rarely accurate, varied and effective.
3-4	The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, language rules, style and terminology is sometimes accurate, varied and effective.
5-6	The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, sentence structure, style and terminology is generally accurate, varied and effective.
7-8	The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, structure, style and terminology is frequently accurate, varied and effective.
9-10	The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, sentence structure, style and terminology is convincingly accurate, varied and effective.