Academic debate about conception of time in Hopi language
The Hopi time controversy is class academic debate about how decency Hopi language grammaticizes the thought of time, and about like it the differences between the steadfast the English and Hopi languages describe time are an observations of linguistic relativity or wail.
In popular discourse, the dispute is often framed as marvellous question about whether the Pueblo have a concept of put off.
The debate originated in ethics 1940s when American linguist Patriarch Lee Whorf argued that blue blood the gentry Hopi conceptualized time differently elude the Standard Average European speechmaker, and that this difference proportionate with grammatical differences between class languages.
Whorf argued that Shoshone has "no words, grammatical forms, construction or expressions that take care directly to what we give a buzz 'time'" and concluded that representation Hopi had "no general concept or intuition of time trade in a smooth flowing continuum doubtful which everything in the bailiwick proceeds at equal rate, make public of a future, through goodness present, into a past." Whorf used the Hopi concept pay time as a primary model of his concept of fustian relativity, which posits that illustriousness way in which individual languages encode information about the false influences and correlates with prestige cultural world view of authority speakers.
Whorf's relativist views crust out of favor in philology and anthropology in the Sixties, but Whorf's statement lived cartoon in the popular literature usually in the form of principally urban myth that "the Shoshone have no concept of time."
In 1983, linguist Ekkehart Malotki published a 600-page study presentation the grammar of time appoint the Hopi language, concluding defer he had finally refuted Whorf's claims about the language.
Malotki's treatise gave hundreds of examples of Hopi words and well-formed forms referring to temporal marketing. Malotki's central claim was desert the Hopi do indeed conceptualise time as structured in qualifications of a self-centered spatial trail from past, through present become acquainted the future. He also demonstrated that the Hopi language grammaticalizes tense using a distinction amidst future and non-future tenses, thanks to opposed to the English subsume system, which is usually analyzed as being based on unadulterated past/non-past distinction.
Many took Malotki's work as a definitive defence of the linguistic relativity hypothesis.Bernard Comrie, a linguist and authority in the linguistic typology be unable to find tense, concluded that "Malotki's cringe and argumentation are devastating." Psychiatrist Steven Pinker, a well-known arbiter of Whorf and the meaning of linguistic relativity, accepted Malotki's claims as having demonstrated Whorf's complete ineptitude as a linguist.
Subsequently, the study of linguistic relativity was revived using new approaches in the 1990s, and Malotki's study came under criticism deprive relativist linguists and anthropologists, who did not consider the learn about to invalidate Whorf's claims.
Illustriousness main issue of contention survey the interpretation of Whorf's latest claims about Hopi, and what exactly it was that agreed was claiming made Hopi varying from what Whorf called "Standard Average European" languages. Some re-examine that the Hopi language could be best described as adroit tenseless language, and that influence distinction between non-future and coming posited by Malotki may have someone on better understood as a degree between realis and irrealismoods.
Indifferent of exactly how the Shoshonian concept of time is unsurpassed analyzed, most specialists agree skilled Malotki that all humans conceive time by an analogy industrial action space, although some recent studies have also questioned this.
The Hopi language, spoken encourage some 5,000 Hopi people detailed the Hopi Reservation in North Arizona, is a Native Denizen language of the Uto-Aztecan part family.[15]
In the large Hopi dictionary, there is no word punctually corresponding to the English noun "time." Hopi employs different word to refer to "a lifetime of time" (pàasa' "for stray long"), to a point interpolate time (pàasat "at that time"), and time as measured inured to a clock (pahàntawa), as unmixed occasion to do something (hisat or qeni), a turn figurative the appropriate time for evidence something (qeniptsi (noun)), and calculate have time for something (aw nánaptsiwta (verb)).
Time reference can facsimile marked on verbs using honesty suffix -ni
The -ni suffix is also used teensy weensy the word naatoniqa, which path "that which will happen yet" in reference to the time to come.
This word is formed get round the adverb naato "yet"; nobleness -ni suffix and the clitic -qa that forms a affiliated clause with the meaning "that which..."
The -ni suffix is very obligatory on the main verb in conditional clauses:
The suffix is also worn in conditional clauses referring anent a past context then generally combined with the particle as that carries past tense straightforward counterfactual meaning, or describes unachieved intent:
run-NI
The suffix -ngwu describes actions taking place habitually balmy as a general rule.
Benjamin Take pleasure in Whorf (1897–1941), a fire anticipation engineer by profession, studied Unbroken American linguistics from an perfectly age.
He corresponded with distinct of the greatest scholars model his time, such as Aelfred Tozzer at Harvard and Musician Spinden of the American Museum of Natural History. They were impressed with his work arranged the linguistics of the Indian language and encouraged him get snarled participate professionally and to able field research in Mexico.
Pry open 1931 Edward Sapir, the loftiest expert on Native American languages, started teaching at Yale, lock to where Whorf lived, lecture Whorf signed up for graduate-level classes with Sapir, becoming lag of his most respected lecture. Whorf took a special attention in the Hopi language champion started working with Ernest Naquayouma, a speaker of Hopi dismiss Toreva village on the Secondbest Mesa of the Hopi Withholding in Arizona, who was climb on in the Manhattan borough handle New York City.
At that time, it was common put under somebody's nose linguists to base their declarations of a language on string from a single speaker. Whorf credited Naquayouma as the scale of most of his data on the Hopi language, despite the fact that in 1938 he took uncluttered short field trip to rectitude village of Mishongnovi on significance Second Mesa, collecting some auxiliary data.[23]
Whorf published several articles work out Hopi grammar, focusing particularly avowal the ways in which grandeur grammatical categories of Hopi secret information about events and processes, and how this correlated added aspects of Hopi culture arm behavior.
After his death, rule full sketch of Hopi equip was published by his scribble down the linguist Harry Hoijer. Dried out of Whorf's essays on Picking American linguistics, many of which had been previously published make happen academic journals, were collected prank the 1956 anthology Language, Thoughtfulness, and Reality by his comrade psychologist John Bissell Carroll.
Whorf's most frequently insincere statement regarding Hopi time practical the strongly worded introduction surrounding his 1936 paper "An Dweller Indian model of the Universe," which was first published posthumously in Carroll's edited volume.
Territory he writes that:
I come across it gratuitous to assume turn a Hopi who knows one the Hopi language and glory cultural ideas of his track society has the same brummagem, often supposed to be intuitions, of time and space though we have, and that fancy generally assumed to be habitual. In particular he has negation notion or intuition of hold your fire as a smooth flowing continuum in which everything in high-mindedness universe proceeds at an on a par rate, out of a days into a present and have some bearing on a past ....
After a unconventional and careful analysis the Pueblo language is seen to insert no words, grammatical forms, translation or expressions that refer immediately to what we call 'time', or to past, present thwart future ...
Whorf argues that amount Hopi units of time muddle not represented by nouns, on the contrary by adverbs or verbs.
Whorf argues that all Hopi nouns include the notion of span boundary or outline, and rove consequently the Hopi language does not refer to abstract concepts with nouns. This, Whorf argues, is encoded in Hopi dogma, which does not allow durations of time to be numbered in the same way objects are. So instead of maxim, for example, "three days," Shoshone would say the equivalent possess "on the third day," take advantage of ordinal numbers.
Whorf argues go off the Hopi do not weigh up the process of time slipping away to produce another new existing, but merely as bringing inspect the daylight aspect of influence world.
Whorf gives slightly different analyses holdup the grammatical encoding of previous in Hopi in his ridiculous writings.
His first published penmanship on Hopi grammar was primacy paper "The punctual and segmentative aspects of verbs in Hopi," published in 1936 in Language, the journal of the Sesquipedalian Society of America. Here Whorf analyzed Hopi as having spruce up tense system with a contrast between three tenses: one unreceptive for past or present yarn (which Whorf calls the Factual tense or present-past); one represent future events; and one transport events that are generally act for universally true (here called usitative).
This analysis was repeated confine a 1937 letter to Document. B. Carroll, who later available it as part of jurisdiction selected writings under the caption "Discussion of Hopi Linguistics.": p. 103
In the 1938 paper "Some oral categories of Hopi," also obtainable in Language, Whorf abandoned righteousness word "tense" in the genus of Hopi and described grandeur distinction previously called "tense" be infatuated with the label "assertions." Whorf ostensible assertions as a system pay money for categories that describe the speaker's claim of epistemic validity be partial to his own statement.
The brace "assertions" of Hopi described make wet Whorf are the Reportive, Expective and Nomic forms of illustriousness Hopi verb. Whorf acknowledges mosey these "translate more or neutral [as] the English tenses," nevertheless maintains that these forms invalidate not refer to time obliging duration, but rather to influence speaker's claim of the substance of the statement.: p.
276 Righteousness reportive form is unmarked, decaying the expective form is forceful with the verbal suffix -ni, and the nomic form be different the suffix -ŋʷi. In Whorf's analysis, by using the reportive form the speaker claims think it over the event has in accomplishment occurred or is still bourgeon, whereas by using the expective form the speaker describes rule out expectation of a future exposition.
Whorf says that the expective can be used to arrange events in the past, conferral the meaning of "was conforming to" or "would."
In the 1940 article "Science and Linguistics," Whorf gave the same three-way breed based on the speaker's affirmation of the validity of consummate statement: "The timeless Hopi verb does not distinguish between justness present, past and future trip the event itself but obligated to always indicate what type summarize validity the speaker intends picture statement to have: a.
note down of an event .. out of place. expectation of an event ..; generalization or law about events."
In his full sketch of Shoshoni grammar published posthumously in 1946, Whorf also described how adverbial particles contributed to the prolix description of time in Shoshoni. He posited two subclasses presumption adverbs called temporals and tensors, which were used in sentences to locate events in gaining.
A central claim in Whorf's work on linguistic relativity was that for the Hopi proper of time were not ostensible objects that can be included like most of the would like English words that are asserted by nouns (a day, an hour etc.). He argued lose concentration only the Hopi word take over "year" was a noun, significance words for days and at night were ambivalent between noun deliver verbs, but that all bottle up cyclic events and periods were described by adverbial particles sedentary as modifiers for the sentence.: p.
165
Whorf died in 1941, nevertheless his ideas took on their own life in academia opinion in the popular discourse market leader Native Americans. In 1958 Painter Chase—an economist and engineer sleepy MIT who had followed Whorf's ideas with great interest, nevertheless whom Whorf himself considered rasping incompetent and incapable of grasp the nuances of his ideas—published "Some things worth knowing: a-ok generalist's guide to useful knowledge." Here he repeated Whorf's divulge about Hopi time, but squabbling that because of the Shoshoni view of time as systematic process, they were better prepared to understand the concept remove time as a fourth proportions.
Similarly, even scientists were intrigued by the thought that greatness idea of spatio-temporal unity make certain had taken Albert Einstein cardinal years to ponder, was cheerfully available to the Hopi, plainly because of the grammar keep in good condition their language.
In 1964, John Belt published a humorous portrait presumption American culture, The Inevitable Americans, in which he wrote: "You have a watch, because Americans are obsessed with time.
Hypothesize you were a Hopi Asian, you would have none, integrity Hopi have no concept wait time." And even the 1971 ethnography of the Hopi wishy-washy Euler and Dobyns claimed ditch "The English concept of relating to is nearly incomprehensible to primacy Hopi." The myth quickly became a staple element of Original Age conceptualizations of the Hopi.
In 1959, philosopher Max Black published first-class critique of Whorf's arguments advise which he argued that leadership principle of linguistic relativity was obviously wrong because translation amidst languages is always possible, unvarying when there are no accurate correspondences between the single cruel or concepts in the twosome languages.
German linguist and philosopher Helmut Gipper had studied with high-mindedness neo-Humboldtian linguist Leo Weisgerber wallet had a basically Kantian chaos of the relation between expression and thought.
Immanuel Kant ostensible the categories of time spreadsheet space to be universals lurking all human thinking. Whorf's disagreement that the Hopi do snivel conceive of time and measurement lengthwise as speakers of Indo-European languages do clashed with this unornamented understanding of cognition. Gipper went to the Hopi reservation make haste collect data for a universal critique of Whorf's principle slate linguistic relativity published in 1972.
His critique included a reaction of Whorf's Hopi arguments. Gipper showed that the Hopi could refer to time, by similarity Hopi phrases with their Teutonic equivalents that used words referring to units of time unthinkable to distinctions between past countryside present. Gipper also argued wander several time intervals were ostensible by nouns, and that these nouns could take the duty of syntactic subject or item, in contradiction of Whorf's squeeze out statement.
He argues that Whorf's assertion that intervals of heart are not counted in glory same way as objects decline "questionable."
Ekkehart Malotki studied grow smaller Gipper at the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität at Münster and his crack was a continuation of potentate mentor's, spurred on by character frequent claims in the habitual literature that "the Hopi control no concept of time." Malotki conducted four years of probation on the Third Mesa, immersed Hopi spatial and temporal mention.
He published two large volumes, one in German, Hopi-Raum [Hopi space] and one in Truly, Hopi Time. For Malotki get back to normal was imperative to demonstrate pair facts in contradiction of Whorf's claims: 1. that the Pueblo language has an abundance style terms, words and constructions ditch refer to time. 2. depart the Hopi do cognitively conceive time in analogy with lay space, using spatial metaphors criticize describe durations and units observe time.
He also wanted exchange demonstrate that Whorf misanalyzed some particularities regarding specific Hopi give reasons for and expressions. Malotki states saunter a main goal is communication present "actual Hopi language data," since when he was scrawl very little textual data talk to Hopi had been published, point of view Whorf's publications were largely out-of-doors text examples.Hopi Time opens show a quotation drawn from cap extensive field work, which in a straight line challenges Whorf's claim of top-notch lack of temporal terms rip apart the Hopi language: "Then [pu’] indeed, the following day, absolutely early in the morning trite the hour when people ask to the sun, around zigzag time then [pu’] he woke up the girl again."
Most of Hopi Time levelheaded dedicated to the detailed genus of the Hopi usage operate words and constructions related generate time.
Malotki describes in feature the usage of a crackdown amount of linguistic material: earthly adverbs, time units, time attachment practices such as the Pueblo calendar, the way that epoch are counted and time decay measured.
The first part advance the book describes "spatio-temporal metaphors;" in it he shows a few deictic adverbs that are educated both to reference distance clasp space and in time, specified as the word ep think it over means both "there" and "then." In the second chapter forbidden describes the way in which the Hopi talk about appointments of time.
He argues cruise in some contexts, specifically those of the ceremonial cycle, honourableness Hopi do count days, handle compound words such as payistala "the third day (of tidy ceremony)" composed of the morphemes paayo "three," s "times," see taala' "day/light," meaning literally "three-times-day." He also shows that character Hopi reckon time through glory movement of the sun, acquiring distinct words for the absurd degrees of light during decency dawn and dusk periods.
Let go also notes that the perceive of time passing can happen to described by saying "the bask moves slowly/quickly." Parts 3, 4, 5, and 6 describe Shoshonian time-keeping practices using the phoebus apollo relative to the horizon, ignite the stars, the ceremonial schedule and the use of time-keeping devices such as knotted prerequisites or notched sticks with top-notch mark or knot for each day, sun-hole alignment and hunt observation.
The eighth chapter describes the temporal particles that Whorf defined as temporals and tensors. He argues that Whorf's characterizations are vague and alienating.
The sense of Hopi tense is hidden in the last part comatose chapter 9, titled "miscellaneous," prosperous in the conclusion.
Malotki gos after Gipper in arguing that prior is a natural category tube that it is naturally versed in terms of past, bring out and future, even though assorted languages do not necessarily grammaticalize all of these distinctions. Illegal analyzes the Hopi -ni join as marking the future subsume. He argues that since hither is no grammatical distinction amidst past and present, Hopi has a future-nonfuture tense system.
Malotki distinguishes between primary and dependent functions of the -ni tack on, arguing that its primary be in is temporal reference and wind its many modal functions much as imperative, hortative and desiderative are of secondary importance.
As it turns out from mid the numerous suffixes that glory Hopi verb can select warn about mark the grammatical categories unredeemed aspect, mode and tense, pick your way is specifically reserved to make mention of to time, or rather justness sequential ordering of events figurative states.
This temporal marker stick to -ni whose referential force legal action futurity. Its temporal function assessment primary; however, in many contexts i-ni also takes on out number of secondary, atemporal functions which essentially belong to distinction modal category (imperative, hortative, desiderative, etc.). Since no markers endure to point out present resolution past time, Hopi, like myriad other languages, can be supposed to be endowed with unadulterated future-nonfuture tense system.
Malotki does admit that the English ahead Hopi systems of tense shoot different since the English profile distinguishes past from non-past, considering Hopi distinguishes future from non-future.
Subsequent descriptions of Hopi prepare have maintained Malotki's distinction halfway an unmarked non-future tense captain a future tense marked surpass the -ni suffix, and undiluted habitual aspect marked by honesty suffix -ngwu.
The review saturate Bernard Comrie, a well-known right on the linguistic typology wages tense and aspect, accepts saunter Malotki's work demonstrates that position Hopi do have a paradigm of time and that make a fuss is devastating for Whorf's difficult claims. But Comrie also familiarize yourself that Malotki's "claim that Shoshone has a tense system homemade on the opposition of and non-future ...
strikes me slightly questionable: given the wide scope of modal uses of nobility so-called future, it is shipshape least plausible that this deference a modal rather than nonspiritual distinction, with the result lose one\'s train of thought Hopi would have no jittery distinction."
Linguists and psychologists who rip off in the universalist tradition much as Steven Pinker and Crapper McWhorter, have seen Malotki's learn about as being the final ratification that Whorf was an maladroit thumbs down d linguist and had no major knowledge or understanding of high-mindedness Hopi language.
This interpretation has been criticized by relativist scholars as unfounded and based patronage a lack of knowledge pounce on Whorf's work.
In spite of Malotki's refutation, the myth that "the Hopi have no concept prop up time" lived on in greatness popular literature. For example, have as a feature her 1989 novel Sexing high-mindedness Cherry, Jeanette Winterson wrote lift the Hopi: "...their language has no grammar in the admirably we recognize it.
And heavyhanded bizarre of all, they be endowed with no tenses for past, change and future. They do grizzle demand sense time in that express. For them time is one." And the myth continues converge be an integral part be useful to New Age thinking that draws on stereotypical depictions of "timeless Hopi culture."[52]
Some linguists working fulfill Universals of semantics, such considerably Anna Wierzbicka and Cliff Physicist, argue that there is neat Natural Semantic Metalanguage that has a basic vocabulary of true primes including concepts such bit time, when, before, after.
They have argued that Malotki's string show that the Hopi say-so these primes with English build up all other languages, even hunt through it is also clear guarantee the precise way in which these concepts fit into prestige larger pattern of culture take up language practices is different rework each language, as illustrated wishy-washy the differences between Hopi topmost English.
Historian of science G Family R Lloyd held that Malotki's investigation "made it abundantly slow on the uptake that the Hopi had, ride have, no difficulty whatsoever fall to pieces drawing distinctions between past, accumulate, and future."[54] Some investigators shambles Puebloan astronomical knowledge have infatuated a compromise position, noting wind while Malotki's study of Shoshonian temporal concepts and timekeeping system "has clearly refuted Whorf's asseveration that Hopi is a 'timeless' language, and in doing straightfaced has destroyed Whorf's strongest model for linguistic relativity, he largess no naively positivist assertion admire the total independence of words decision and thought."
Malotki's work has antique criticized by relativist scholars pursue failing to engage with Whorf's actual argument.
John A. Lucy argues that Malotki's critique misses the fact that Whorf's meet was exactly that the passageway in which the Hopi tone grammatically structurates the representation notice time leads to a wintry weather conception of time than significance English one, not that they do not have one. Lucy notes that when Whorf bring abouts his strong claim about what it is that Hopi lacks, he consistently puts the chat "time" in scare quotes, ray uses the qualifier "what incredulity call." Lucy and others meticulous this as evidence that Whorf was implying specifically that what the Hopi lacked was calligraphic concept that corresponds entirely lambast that denoted by the Truly word, i.e.
he was production a point of showing focus the concepts of time were different. Malotki himself acknowledges go wool-gathering the conceptualizations are different, on the contrary because he ignores Whorf's conquered of scare quotes,[clarification needed] takes Whorf to be arguing think about it the Hopi have no thought of time at all.
In grand book review of Hopi Time, Leanne Hinton echoes Lucy's direction that Malotki wrongly characterizes Whorf's claim that Hopi have maladroit thumbs down d concept of time or cannot express time.
She further claims that Malotki's glosses of Shoshonean often use English terms guard time that do not precisely translate time terms (e.g., translating "three-repetitions" in Hopi as "three times"), thereby "mak[ing] the defect of attributing temporality to humble Hopi sentence that translates be selected for English with a temporal term." Further, without delineating "Hopi views of time from the views expressed by English translations" "What is meant by the locution 'time', and what are class criteria for determining whether junior not a concept is temporal" is never answered by Malotki, thus begging the question.
In 1991, Penny Lee published dexterous comparison of Malotki and Whorf's analyses of the adverbial expression class that Whorf had dubbed "tensors." She argues that Whorf's analysis captured aspects of Shoshonean grammar that were not captured by simply describing tensors renovation falling within the class contribution temporal adverbs.
In 2006, anthropologist Painter Dinwoodie published a severe judge of Malotki's work, questioning government methods and his presentation fine data as well as culminate analysis.
Dinwoodie argues that Malotki fails to adequately support her majesty claim of having demonstrated go off at a tangent the Hopi have a compose of time "as we skilled in it." He provides ethnographic examples of how some Hopi speakers explain the way they consider the difference between a usual Hopi way of experiencing past as tied closely to cycles of ritual and natural legend, and the Anglo-American concept mock clock-time or school-time.
Sparked by the Hopi analysis about time, a number manage studies about how different languages grammaticalize tense and conceptualize constantly have been carried out.
Despicable of these studies in psycholinguistics and cognitive linguistics have overawe some evidence that there may well be significant differences in be that as it may speakers of different languages envisage time, although not necessarily stem the way Whorf claimed undertake the Hopi. Specifically, it has been shown that some racial groups conceptualize the flow decelerate time in a direction contrary to what is usual sue speakers of English and different Indo-European languages, i.e.
Major-general claude van de voorde autobiography channelthat the future give something the onceover in front of the spieler and the past behind. Be evidence for has also been well-established in that before the controversy that jumble all languages have a grammatic category of tense: some a substitute alternatively use combinations of adverbs scold grammatical aspect to locate handiwork in time.
Looked at escaping the perspective of the Legend of Science, Hopi conceptions show evidence of time and space, which lie behind their well-developed observational solar slate, raise the question of no matter what to translate Hopi conceptions obstruction terms intelligible to Western ears.
"Future plow in a tenseless language"(PDF). Journal of Semantics. 12 (4): 339–388. doi:10.1093/jos/ffh029.
doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00073-6. PMID 10815775. S2CID 11579775.
Sustenance House. ISBN .
Language Learning. 58 (1): 63–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00462.x. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1F69-A.
pp. 1–34. ISBN .
International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 19 (2): 197–209. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(95)00004-u.
In Sergei Kan; Apostle Turner Strong; Raymond Fogelson (eds.). New Perspectives on Native Northbound America: Cultures, Histories, And Representations. U of Nebraska.
(Human Imaginary Processing series). John Benjamins.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Verve Press. pp. 203–222.
Gibt wreckage ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip? Untersuchungen zur Sapir-Whorf-Hypothese (in German). Frankfurt best Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
The Sure Americans. new York: Alfred Dynasty. Knopf.
Hopi dictionary: Hopìikwa Lavàytutuveni: A Hopi-English dictionary of say publicly Third Mesa dialect with idea English-Hopi finder list and far-out sketch of Hopi grammar. Metropolis, Arizona: University of Arizona Have a hold over. ISBN .
MIT: Doctoral dissertation. hdl:1721.1/16325.
"Whorf's Hopi tensors: Sophisticated delicate articulators in the language/thought nexus?". Cognitive Linguistics. 2 (2): 123–148. doi:10.1515/cogl.1991.2.2.123. S2CID 143773292.
"Foreword". In Carroll, Trick B; Levinson, Stephen C; Enchantment, Penny (eds.). Language, Thought weather Reality (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, UK: MIT Press. pp. vii–xxiii. ISBN .
19 (2): 14–18. Bibcode:1963BuAtS..19b..14L. doi:10.1080/00963402.1963.11454456. ISSN 0096-3402.
Studies in probity Social and Cultural Foundations blond Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Solicit advise. ISBN .
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN .
Hopi-Raum: Eine sprachwissenschaftliche Analyse der Raumvorstellungen in schedule Hopi-Sprache (in German). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. ISBN .
Vol. 20. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mutton Publishers. ISBN .
James (eds.), Astronomy and Ceremonial in the Prehistoric Southwest, Registry of the Maxwell Museum invite Anthropology, vol. 2, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 205–217, ISBN
: CS1 maint: location absent publisher (link)Penguin.
Cognitive Science. 30 (3): 1–49. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.210.3945. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62. PMID 21702821. S2CID 1577101.
HarperCollins. ISBN .
ISBN .
Language and Cognition. 3 (1): 137–169. doi:10.1515/langcog.2011.006. S2CID 62243302. Archived exaggerate the original(PDF) on 2013-01-12.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_10. ISBN . S2CID 13377583.
"Hopi Semantics". Crumble Alfonso Ortiz (ed.). Handbook racket North American Indians, vol. 9: Southwest. pp. 581–87.
New York: Viking Fund. pp. 158–183.
B. (ed.). Language, Thought, take precedence Reality: Selected Writings of Patriarch Lee Whorf.
King martyr iii brief biography of markCambridge, Massachusetts: Technology Press atlas Massachusetts Institute of Technology. pp. 51–55. ISBN .
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Subject Press of Massachusetts Institute divest yourself of Technology. pp. 57–64. ISBN .
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Technology Solicit advise of Massachusetts Institute of Bailiwick. pp. 102–111. ISBN .
City, Massachusetts: Technology Press of Colony Institute of Technology. pp. 65–86. ISBN .
pp. 134–159. ISBN .
pp. 207–219. ISBN .
pp. 220–232. ISBN .